Fading from Memory

To content | To menu | To search

Monday 29 January 2007

The big question (part 2)

One thing I quickly realised is that the goals I drew up yesterday are complexly inter-related. It does not work that if we cannot keep mum and dad happy then, and only then, do we try to look after our own happiness. We must try to look after both - all four of the goals, actually - at the same time.

And there were some salutary comments on that too: I take the point that contentment may be all we can aim for for mum and dad.

What I need to add to yesterday's thinking are the circumstances under which the move to care would be necessary beyond question. I think the various scenarios are as follows:
  1. mum or dad turn into a wanderer
  2. mum or dad lose control of their bowels
  3. mum or dad lose all ability to feed themselves
  4. mum or dad lose mobility
  5. dad goes blind
  6. mum's violence persists
So now, what are the pros and cons of the two alternatives?

Staying at home

Pros

Cons

  • familiarity - house, garden, belongings, cats, each other
  • freedom - from disciplinary attitudes
  • identity reinforcement - external memory
  • feelings of control - when to get up, where to sit
  • loneliness - for dad, but for mum, the opposite
  • intermittent care - because we cannot always be there
  • poor hygiene - mum's in general, dirty cutlery and crockery

Moving into care

Pros

Cons

  • cleanliness - clean sheets, clothes, hair, teeth, skin
  • nutrition - three meals a day
  • stimulation - outings, events and company
  • safety
  • properly administered medicine
  • discipline - regarding medicine, behaviour, times, etc
  • confusing surroundings - particularly for mum
  • loss of identity - very likely for mum
  • getting rid of the cats
  • feelings of abandonment - very likely for mum
  • lack of understanding - certain in mum's case. because of her dysphasia
  • irreversibility - without huge financial costs
  • likely separation - when required levels of care differ

There is something very unsatisfactory about the lists above - but I cannot quite put my finger on it. It may be that I'd hoped that this would aid the decision, but it seems to only re-echo the uncertainty of yesterday. I hope Greg and Rachel, and any others who read this, may be able to suggest modifications to these lists.

We've discovered that the social services are not quite as advertised, and I've learnt from reading other people's blogs that nursing homes are also not as advertised. Their brochures and spiels present their best-case scenarios. I am trying to mentally prepare myself for experiences like those I've read about: finding a parent lying in a wet bed, noticing wounds on their arm, discovering them sitting, apparently catatonic, beside a noisy haranguing other demented person.

Obviously there are no answers here. I'll just have to come back to this again later.

Sunday 28 January 2007

The big question

Do we leave mum and dad at home or move them into care?

It is clearly an understatement to say that this is a difficult decision, as most families wrangle with the issue for months, perhaps years, and often continue with self-recrimination and doubts for some time after the decision has been made. Like a lot of life's big decisions - should I move overseas, should I get married, or divorced, should we have children - it has long-term consequences and can be irreversible. However, the scale of the consequences is not what makes this a difficult decision, it is the lack of clarity that does that.

Just to make sure I have made this distinction clearly, here is a contrasting example, a decision that has serious lifelong consequences, yet is clear and easy to make:

I am driving with the whole family in the car. Do I concentrate on driving, or forget about it and just join in the conversation?

Obvious answer, but only because the consequences are so clear, not because the costs of making the wrong decision are trivial - they are clearly not.

We can at least put some bounds around the current problem by noting that:
  1. Mum and dad will steadily get worse, never better.
  2. At some stage, 24-hour care and observation will be essential.
Only death will avoid this. None of us has any delusions about that.

The problem is that, while there is still a decision to be made, there are no other certainties. Only two alternatives (each with a number of variants) yet both are essentially unknowns. It is almost like playing 'pick a box'.

We must also define our goals and decide which of them takes priority over the other. Again, this is not so easy. In the driving example above it simply went without saying that avoiding a car crash is a more important goal than having an enjoyable conversation. Yet, if this were not so, just for the sake of argument, the answer to the question might be different.

What are the alternatives?
Staying at home versus going into care.

What are we trying to establish?
When to make the move.

What are the goals?
  1. to keep mum and dad happy
  2. to keep the rest of us happy
  3. to keep mum and dad alert
  4. to keep mum and dad alive
What information do we need?
The pros and cons of the two alternatives, under varying circumstances

Actually, now that I think about it, this is just another candidate for three-step structured problem solving:
  1. gather and analyse the information
  2. decide what to do
  3. implement the decision
Sounds simple enough, but it is surprising how often people reverse or scramble this sequence. It is clear that part of step 1 is compiling the pros and cons of our two alternatives, and how these will shift one way or the other as circumstances (such as health or competence) change - for which I feel I am fast running out of time and space today.

I think I shall stop here now, just to give myself a few hours to accept that these really are the goals in order of priority, and to give the others time to chip in with their contributions too. I'll continue tomorrow...

Sunday 21 January 2007

Inherited forgetting

I heard through the grapevine that an American publication is preparing an article on the genetic form or forms of Alzheimer's disease. Despite the fact that I have two parents diagnosed with the disease, and a strong possibility that my only grandparent who lived to any significant age also suffered, I am pretty sanguine about the chance of 'inheriting' the disease for reasons that are outlined in the correspondence below. My family exchanged a few emails on this subject just after we learnt that dad had Alzheimer's. I'm taking the opportunity to collect the correspondence here.

First, I wrote as follows to Derek (1 Jul 2006):

I told the Psychogeriatrician that you had been concerned about the hereditary implications of having two parents with Alzheimer's disease. She pointed me towards research on the allele Apoliprotein E. Her suggested search string was 'Apo E allele status'. I've tried it, and learnt that there appears to be a weak correlation between onset of Alzheimer's and the type 4 allele of this gene. I don't know if it is worth testing for it.

She also gave me a paper to give to you. It is a summary of the research into risk and protective factors for the disease. I've since found it on the web, at

http://www.alzheimers.org.au/upload/DementiaPreventedSept05.pdf

There seems to be a problem with the PDF file, but I was able to download it in HTML form. It is pretty readable. Much of it is rather inconclusive, though a couple of glasses of wine per day and a generally healthy lifestyle seem to do you a lot of good.

I followed this up with another email later in the month (26 Jul 2006):

As for the e4 allele of the Apo E gene, it appears that it has only a WEAK correlation with Alzheimer's (AD), it has not been identified as a cause. Having only one copy is correlated with AD. Without knowing how common the e4 allele is, it is impossible to give even approximate odds. However, I did read somewhere that about 11% of people have it.

  • about half of all AD cases have e4 - a 25% chance that both mum and dad have at least one copy of e4
  • e4 is associated with early onset AD - suggests that neither mum nor dad have e4
  • it seems e4 is anti-correlated with retinal deterioration - mum probably has it, dad probably doesn't
  • if you have e4 you have a 25-40% lifetime chance of getting AD - not much more than anyone who lives long

I found that a google search using

"apo e" incidence ad

produced a good selection of web pages.

[NB: I then included a text without noting its source. I've now found something very similar at (http://www.essaysample.com/essay/000454.html). It seems to give a good introduction to the main AD issues.]

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

We are currently living in the age of technology. Our advancements in the past few decades overshadow everything learned in the last 2000 years. With the elimination of many diseases through effective cures and treatments, Canadians can expect to live a much longer life then that of their grandparents. In 1900 about 4% of the Canadian population was over the age of 65. In 1989 that figure tripled to 12% and the government expects that figure to rise to 23% by the year 2030 (Medical, 1991, p.13). This increase has brought with it a large increase in diseases associated with old age. Alzheimer's dementia is one of the most common and feared diseases afflicting the elderly community. AD, once thought to be a natural part of aging, is a severely debilitating form of mental dementia. Although some other types of dementia are curable or effectively treatable, there is currently no cure for the Alzheimer variety.

A general overview of Alzheimer's disease including the clinical description, diagnosis, and progression of symptoms, helps one to further understand the treatment and care of patients, the scope of the problem, and current research.

The clinical definition of dementia is "a deterioration in intellectual performance that involves, but is not limited to, a loss in at least 2 of the following areas: language, judgement, memory, visual or depth perception, or judgement interfering with daily activities" (Institute, 1996, p.4).

The initial cause of AD symptoms is a result of the progressive deterioration of brain cells (neurons) in the cerebral cortex of the brain. This area of the brain, which is the largest and uppermost portion, controls all our thought processes, movement, speech, and senses. This deterioration initially starts in the area of the cortex that is associated with memory and then progresses into other areas of the cortex, then into other areas of the brain that control bodily function. The death of these cells causes an interruption of the electrochemical signals between neurons that are a key to cognitive as well as bodily functioning.

Currently AD can only be confirmed at autopsy. After death the examined brain of an Alzheimer victim shows two distinct characteristics. The first is the presence of neuritic plaques in the cerebral cortex and other areas of the brain including cerebral blood vessels. These plaques consist of groups of neurons surrounded by deposits of beta-amyloid protein. The presence of these plaques is also common to other types of dementia.

The second characteristic, neurofibliary tangles, is what separates AD from all other forms of dementia. Neurofibliary tangles take place within the disconnected brain cells themselves. When examined under a microscope diseased cells appear to contain spaghetti-like tangles of normally straight nerve fibers. The presence of these tangles was first discovered in 1906 by the German neurologist Alois Alzheimer, hence the name Alzheimer's disease.

Although the characteristics listed above are crucial to the diagnosis of AD upon death, the clinical diagnosis involves a different process. The diagnosis of AD is only made after all other illnesses, which may have the same symptoms, are ruled out. The initial symptoms of AD are typical of other treatable diseases therefore doctors are hesitant to give the diagnosis of Alzheimer's in order to save the patient from the worsening of a treatable disease through a misdiagnosis. Some of the initial symptoms include an increased memory loss, changes in mood, personality, and behavior, symptoms that are common of depression, prescription drug conflict, brain tumors, syphilis, alcoholism, other types of dementia, and many other conditions.

The onset of these symptoms usually brings the patient to his family doctor. The general practitioner runs a typical battery of urinalysis and blood tests that he sends off to the lab. If thetests come back negative, and no other cause of the symptoms is established, the patient is then refereed to a specialist. The specialist, usually a psychiatrist, will then continue to rule out other possible illnesses through testing. If the next battery of tests also comes back negative then the specialist will call on a neurologist to run a series of neurological examinations including a PET and CAT scan to rule out the possibility of brain tumors. A spinal tap is also performed to determine the possibility of other types of dementias. The patient will also undergo a complete psychiatric evaluation. If the patient meets the preliminary criteria for AD an examination of the patients medical history is also necessary to check for possible genetic predispositions to the disease.

The psychiatric team finally meets with the neurological team to discuss their findings. If every other possible disease is ruled out, and the results of the psychiatric evaluation are typical to that of a person with AD, the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease is given.

The initial symptoms of AD are usually brushed off as a natural part of aging. The myth that a person's memory worsens over time is just that - a myth (Myers, 1996, p.100-101). AD's victims are mostly over the age of 65 and many delay treatment by attributing their problems to age. A victim might forget a well known phone number or miss an important appointment. These symptoms eventually escalate to the total disintegration of personality and all patients end up in total nursing care. In descending order, the patient goes from

  1. decreased ability to handle a complex job to
  2. decreased ability to handle such complex activities of daily life as
  3. managing finances,
  4. complex meal preparation and
  5. complex marketing skills. Next comes
  6. loss of ability to pick out clothing properly,
  7. or to put on clothing properly, followed by
  8. loss of ability to handle the mechanics of bathing properly. Then
  9. progressive difficulties with continence and
  10. toileting occur, followed by
  11. very limited speech ability and
  12. inability to speak more than a single word. Next comes
  13. loss of ambulatory capability. Last to go are such basic functions as
  14. sit up
  15. smile and
  16. hold up one's head (Brassard, 1993, p.10).

The average time from diagnosis to inevitable death is 8 years. The family of the victim is usually able to care for the victim for an average period of about 4 years (Alzheimer's, 1996, p.44).During the progression of the disease between 10% and 15% of patients hallucinate and suffer delusions, 10% will become violent and 10% suffer from seizures (Alzheimer's, 1996, p.46).

Once a person is diagnosed as having AD, an assessment is made of the disease's stage of progression and of the strengths and weaknesses of the victim and the victim's family. There are different types of assessments available to evaluate the level of dysfunction of the patient. Based on one of these assessments a care plan is put together by a team consisting of a family member, a paid or unpaid care provider, and the victim's physician. Throughout the progression of the disease, and depending on the needs of the patient, a wide range of expensive medication, such as psychoactive drugs to lift depression and sedatives to control violence, may be required.

Unfortunately, although a wide range of treatments have been tested, most prove to be ineffective. At the beginning of the disease the family is able to look after the patient without much effort. Frequently families will hire a care giver in order to alleviate some of the work.

Simple changes in the home can make life much easier for the sufferer, help them keep their self esteem, and prolong their stay at home. Examples of low-cost modifications to the environment include reducing the noise levels in the home (telephones, radios, voices, etc.); avoiding vividly patterned rugs and drapes; placing locks up high or down low on doors leading outside (AD sufferers are known to wander off); clearing floors of clutter; reducing the contents of closets in order to simplify choices (Alzheimer, 1992, p.17). These costs are paid for by the victim's family. Many of these, and other more expensive modifications are introduced in long-term care settings. They help in maintaining the safety and security of the victim as well as reducing their confusion.

The patient's and the family's condition should be assessed every six months (Alzheimer, 1992, p.21). In response to constantly changing needs, the aspects of care must be constantly modified. Other issues that usually arise during the care of the patient are assessment of the competence of the victim, power of attorney, and response to and prevention of abuse (Aronson, 1988, p.124). Eventually the victim's condition deteriorates to the point where home care is no longer possible and they must be moved to a long-term care facility.

In Canada care, support and information for victims and their families comes from the health care system and the Alzheimer's Society of Canada. The care giver must obtain information and education about the disease in order to effectively care for the victim. During the course of the disease victims might wander, hallucinate, become suspicious. This behavior can place a large strain on the care giver as well as causing depression and deterioration of their own health (Aronson, 1988, p.132). An AD support group is crucial to alleviating some of the stress on the care giver. Through a support group the care giver is given the emotional and practical help needed to accomplish the large task of looking after the victim for as long as possible.

Currently there are 300,000 persons in Canada with AD. This figure is more than that of Parkinson's disease, cancer and multiple sclerosis combined. With continuous growth in the percentage of Canadians over the age of 65, this figure could hit 700,000 by the year 2020 (Carlton, 1996, p.17). These large and increasing figures translate into a large burden on the health care system. Even when using the most conservative estimates of the average number of years spent in an institution and the number of afflicted Canadians, the costs to health care are immense. At $33,000 (1989) per patient per year in an institution and with an average stay of three years until death, the cost of AD will amount to $3 billion over the next three years; and if the entry into the disease state remains constant, it will cost the Canadian taxpayer [an added] $1 billion per year thereafter. (Brassard, 1993, p.11)

There have been many studies that conclude that the number of incidences of AD is on the rise. A very high incidence was reported in a U.S. survey conducted in East Boston by the Harvard Medical school. It showed the incidence of AD to be 3% for people between the ages of 65-74, 18.7% for those between 75-84, and 47.2% for those over 84 (Evans, 1989, p.4).

AD is a democratic disease. It affects persons of both sexes and all races and ethnic backgrounds. The major risk factors for AD are age and heredity. Persons with a high incidence of AD in their family history are most susceptable.

A specific subtype of AD exists that is solely connected to heredity. This subtype is known as Familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD). FAD is also known as Early Onset Alzheimer's disease, named so because its symptoms start to develop much earlier than in the regular sporadic type. Only 5%-10% of all cases are of this type. FAD is suspected when AD can be traced over several generations and there is a history of, among previously affected family members, a similar age of onset and duration of the disease (usually 4 years). Approximately 50% of the children of an affected parent go on to develop the disease (Pollen, 1993, p.89).

Much research has been conducted in an attempt to locate the gene that is responsible for FAD. Currently, researchers have isolated genes 1, 14, and 21 (Alzheimer's, 1996, p.36), however, the evidence still remains inconclusive (Statement, 1996, p.2). There is also a possibility that a specific genetic mutation merely puts a person at risk to the disease and AD is triggered by an external force e.g. a head injury. (Statement, 1996, p.4). Finding the specific location of the gene will pave the way for a diagnostic or even predictive test for FAD. Similar genetic tests already exist for cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy. Locating the AD gene will also allow scientists to study why the particular gene is not functioning properly and may give clues to treatment and cure. The long term goal of this research is the same as that of any other genetic research and that is gene therapy - which is the possibility that science could one day alter our genetic make-up.

The other much more common type of AD is Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease (SAD). This includes all other types of the disease which are not linked to heredity. Genetic research is also playing a major role in the progress towards a diagnostic or predictive test for SAD. Recently, a gene involved in the transport of cholesterol has been identified to be associated with AD. Apolipoprotein E is located on chromosome 19 and seems to contribute to the susceptibility of a person to AD (Statement, 1996, p.6). The gene exists in three different forms or alleles (Apo E 2,3,4) and each person has a combination of two of the three. Thus an individual can have any one of the following combinations: Apo E 2/2, 3/3, 4/4, 2/3/, 3/4 or 2/4. Researchers have found a relationship between the number of copies of the 4 allele and the person's probability of developing the disease.

The same day, Rebecca wrote as follows to her father Derek:

Remember about apoe 2 3 and 4, I think the text book I left behind will give you a good flavour - also re alcohol & dementia, as far as I am aware there is only one systematic review so far and it's not finished yet. Don't worry, if you can all hold off dementing till I finish writing up you'll know about 90% of the risk factors!

If Mike is interested I'm happy to send him any copies of what I have.

Also worth remembering that AD can't be diagnosed until post mortem and most cases diagnosed in life have vascular factors found after death so it's not nearly straight forward - anyway I think granddad is more likely a mixture - read the ftD and the lewy body chapters and remember his hallucinations...

I then emailed her as follows (27 Jul 2006):

The more I learn about it, the more I also suspect dad may well have vascular dementia as well. He's had a series of vascular problems, as we all know, and the dementia seemed to cut in so fast. As you say, we'll never know until we get their brains in our hands! Meanwhile, Aricept courses began for both of them today. The nurse will come around to the house every morning and make sure they take their pills.

Yes, I would be interested in reading anything you feel like passing around, including a draft of your thesis.

She then emailed me some of her papers and draft thesis chapters on risk factors.

The upshot of all this is that, whether or not you have genes associated with Alzheimer's disease, you should be doing what you already know you ought to do: eat well, stay active, avoid smoking, etc.

Monday 1 January 2007

2006 review

Problem

Solution

Notes

Food

1. Eating cat food

Put all dry cat food in a dispenser.

Buy single-serving cans of cat food.

Adoption of the dry food dispenser is a struggle. Since other members of the family are not filling the dispenser when they buy dry cat food, the full or half-full cartons remain in the cupboard and are available for mum and dad to eat from.

2. Not finishing Meals on Wheels meals

1) MOW to supervise mum and dad’s eating, and if not this then

2) put food out on plates, and if not this then

3) leave the meals unsealed and take lids away with them.

MOW are a little haphazard in their implementation of this. Dad tells them it is not necessary to put the food out, and they go along with him. I’ve asked specific volunteers to stick to the instructions, but have not asked the service to reitierate the message to all volunteers.

3. Not eating fresh fruit and vegetables

Provide fresh fruit and vegetables at weekends and on Wednesday.

Social services visit on Monday and Friday afternoons to provide food for mum and dad, first feeding the cats.

Greg and Regan generally do not provide fresh food at weekends.

Rachel has not yet established a routine for visiting and providing meals on Wednesdays.

The fresh food emphasis of the evening meals on Mondays and Fridays is not strong. The meals are also rather small.

4. Eating food past its use-by date

Regularly clear out the cupboards.

It would be better if old opened packages of food were either used up or cleared out before new purchases were added to the cupboards.

5. Very poor evening meals

same as 3.

same as 3.

Medical

6. Not taking medicine

The nurses adminster medicine at about 1:30 pm, take no for an answer, and avoid trouble when it flares. They do not visit on Wednesdays.

Dad gives it most days to mum.

The nurses’ visits are still being made in the morning, when mum is either asleep or cranky. We ought to switch to the evening round.

7. Missing doctors' appointments

Manage appointments for them.



Problem

Solution

Notes

Cleaning

8. Not cleaning cutlery and crockery

On Wednesdays, when dad is at day care, Rachel gives mum an outing. During this time social services clean the house.

So far I, not Rachel, have organised this. Last week there was a communication breakdown and Alison was sent home by dad. Alison normally arrives at 12:30 and works until 2:30. I leave notes for what I’d like her to do each week.

The washing machine needs fixing or replacing.

We need a reliable supply of pegs if washing is to be put out on the line.

9. Not dusting

10. Not washing clothes, bedding, or towels

11. Not cleaning the floors or toilet

Psychological

12. Boredom

Dad goes to the Day Care centre on Mondays and Wednesdays.

Rachel takes mum out on Wednesdays.

Dad is still not used to the idea of going on Monday (partly because of the Christmas and New Year disruption to the routine) and has even suggested that visits on Mondays are not necessary.

Rachel has not yet begun the outings for mum.

13. Confusion

‘Distraction and subtraction’ (reduce clutter in the house).

Provide a large calendar with each day crossed out as time progresses. The nurses will cross out the days for mum and dad.

Social services have provided a combination mini-safe to contain housekeys for fixing to the outside of the house – so that if the house is locked up we can always gain access.

Change the locks so that they cannot be deadlocked from inside.

We have done nothing to reduce the clutter in the house.

The calendar idea was unpopular and ineffective and so has been stopped.

We have not changed the locks or provided a means of access through the screen door.

14. Mum stealing the mail

A secure mail box.

The new secure mailbox is a failure because postmen leave the letters hanging out of the slot and mail is therefore easily removed. A different design is required.


Problem

Solution

Notes

Hygiene

15. Not showering or bathing

A shower stool and a handheld showerspray have been installed.

All soap in the house has been replaced with sorbolene (because it doesn’t matter if it is left on the skin and not rinsed off).

Deodorant and wet baby wipes have been supplied for Rachel to try out on mum.

Wine has been supplied to relax mum and make her more pliable.

Dad says he showers before going to Day Care and church.

Mum does not wash either herself or her clothes and her room now stinks.

Rachel should continue to persuade mum to take a bath or a shower or even just a wash, and try various incentives.

Safety

16. Vulnerability to robbery and violence

Real valuables are in the safe.

The amount of money in the house is limited to a maximum of $200.

An online webcam has been installed.

Police have not yet been asked to keep a closer watch on the house.

Rachel reports freezing of the video stream when watching the webcam from home, but the webcam server software appears to be serving images correctly.

17. Uncertainty on the outside steps

White lines have been painted on them.

At first dad considered these lines confusing but now says he has got the hang of them.

18. Mum's attacks on dad

Counselling dad and possibly mum when it happens.

Mum’s attacks are worse than before: more frequent and more easily triggered. Counselling mum and dad is useless.


- page 2 of 6 -