I've had to keep saying 'no' to dad this week. He has continued to ring me every day to ask, among other things, whether I am going over to visit. His calls grew more numerous for a while, but have now slackened off a little. I presume he has pinned his hopes on Greg instead.

There has been one over-riding reason for my hardened attitude. I am self-employed, and do most of my work on an hourly basis. There are no such things as 'days off' for me. If I don't work, I get no money. It just so happens that I have plenty of work to do before the end of this month, and I cannot delay any of it beyond 1st October. If I miss my deadline it means not only do I upset the client but I also let slip work that I've been asked to do. And work that I've been asked to do, if done, is work that I should be paid for. In other words, every hour I spend on mum and dad this month is directly costing me money.

The secondary reason is that I feel I ought to draw back a little anyway. There is no doubt both mum and dad would like me to visit every day. Sometimes, when I leave, I have to promise mum that I'll be back 'tomorrow', even when it isn't true. Yet I cannot afford, financially or for my own peace of mind, to be there every day. Just what the optimal balance is I do not know. That is exactly what I'm trying to discover.

I'm somewhat reassured that lately mum and dad appear to be talking more to each other, going for walks (however ill-fated they turn out to be), and so on. This indicates they are exercising some rediscovered independence.

Maybe my relative absence over these few days will toughen them up. Maybe it will not. I remember when Greg and I were sent to boarding school, I thought it was because we were to get a better education, Greg thought it was because mum and dad didn't love us any more! Who knows how they will perceive being on the other end of the stick?